Friday, March 06, 2009

Makes You Want to Puke...
Via Kathy Shaidle at Five Feet of Fury;

""Times have changed and now the poor get fat

Today's "poor" are the rich Jesus warned you about: fat, slovenly, wasteful of their money and other people's.

I prefer to call them "the broke."

A lot of (really naive) people are wondering (or pretending to wonder, when they're in public) how this "homeless" guy could "afford" a cellphone:

It would be better phrased: why is a guy with a cellphone homeless? Because then the question answers itself.

He spends all his (our) money on cellphones and, most likely, tattoos and drugs and booze and other crap, and has no money left for a home and food. And why should he bother? We pay for his shelter and food anyhow.

And so far there's no government "free cellphone for poor people" program.
Ooops, I spoke too soon.

What's really funny in that news story by the way is what they're serving at the soup kitchen: risotto with brocolli . Obviously some rich white liberal did the cooking that day, feeling all proud of herself, and what thanks did she get? Some lowclass loser going, "You expect me to eat this weird crap?!" "

People who defend scumbags like the one pictured above, or who clamor to close the so-called 'gaps' or 'divides' between whites and blacks -- and usually both are done at the expense of whites -- should be taken out and shot. Repeatedly. There is no excuse for's blatant theft.

I'm fed up with this, too. It's bad enough the US government has now decided it can permanently nest in people's wallets, and give 'tax refunds' to people who don't pay taxes. If I hear the word 'reparations' sometime during the next four years (in fact, if I ever hear it again!), I'm grabbing the nearest blunt object and going on a killing spree. American blacks have already had reparations, they just arrived in the form of the 14th Amendment, the Civil Rights Act, The Voting Rights Act, Affirmative Action, 40 years of the Federal Welfare State, and now one of their own occupies the White House. I think we're all paid up by now, and if some of you continue to think that your Savior can now just order up (I think the term used on the street is 'hook me up') a whole mess of really nice things for you at government (i.e. my) expense, think again.

We're approaching the day when the real citizens of this country, of all races -- the ones who actually work and produce the wealth and who are about to be harried to inhuman levels by a government set on bankrupting them in the name of politics -- will be angry enough to start shooting at those who don't. Be warned homeless-man-with-a-cellphone, be warned illegal -immigrants-filing-the-emergency-room-with-tuberculosis-cases, be warned useless-mouth- warned.

Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Ted Kennedy to be knighted? What kind of crap is this? Has the Queen of England lost her mind? I can think of no one who is more the antithesis of the knightly code of chivalry than Ted Kennedy. I can think of no one who deserves this honor less, given the man's history. However, the Queen has been asked to bestow a knighthood upon Teddy for...well, no one can quite explain it.

But there are some folks who can explain why it shouldn't happen.

Here's one, courtesy of the UK's Daily Mail.

And Ed Anger of the WeeklyWorldNews chimes in, as well.
Keith Olbermann is a Ninny, Part II...
Heh. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, really. For anyone who doesn't know, Keith Olbermann is the host of (P)MSNBC's Countdown, a show in which Keith pretends to be delivering news and opinions on the events of the day, but which really serves as that network's version of Comedy Central's The Daily Show, inasmuch as the point is not to convey meaningful information but to lampoon conservatives and/or republicans.

Only Keith isn't as funny as John Stewart, and his main shtick is taking a gaffe or petty foible and turning it into an essay on the hypocrisy of (republican) man, delivered with the sneer of a metrosexual whose banana hammock is just a bit too tight, under a bewildering array of invective which could have been written for Keith by any third-grader. It is painful to watch, and it's annoying. Olbermann gives one the impression that he's simultaneously sitting on his vibrator and having lemon juice poured into an open wound.

Anyways, Keith's chief cause is in trying to convince you that republicans are dumb, and he usually does this by calling their qualifications and bona fides into question. Well, now Keith's been caught in his own web, courtesy of Ann Coulter. You can read it here, lifted from the web pages of Human Events.

It's exquisite.

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Bipartisan, Indeed!
I keep hearing all of this talk about 'bi-partisanship' in Washington, most of it coming from people who wouldn't know the definitions of co-operation and compromise, even if you somehow managed to distill the essence of both concepts into a liquid and injected it into them anally.

Quite frankly, I for one don't want this here 'bi-partisanship'. For a start, I don't think it's healthy or safe to have politicians to be in complete agreement on anything, particularly when there's money involved. Secondly, I didn't send republicans to Congress to jump into bed with democrats -- I sent them there (or tried to) in order for them to do the opposite of what democrats wanted them to do. Finally, there's the open question of just what does each side really mean when they say 'bi-partisan'?

To a democrat, it means "do what I say, even if it's silly, destructive, expensive or all three at once, or I'll embarrass you in public by calling you nasty names on Meet The Press."

To a republican, it means "do what I say, because it's more often right than it is wrong, but if you insist on calling me a nasty name on Meet The Press, I'll water it down to accommodate you."

A pox on both their houses, I say! I don't want bi-partisanship, I don't want compromise, I don't want harmony in Washington, D.C.!

I want results. And the results I want can only be achieved one way; with republicans digging in their heels and standing up for what's right, and democrats revealed for the weak-headed and insidious grubs that they are.
Caveat Emptor...
It seems some Obamatards are actually beginning to regret their ill-informed choice.

Note the prevalence of goatees and vacant stares; Perhaps this is some sort of characteristic that identifies brain-damaged voters? Hat tip to