"Help" Syrian Rebels? Why?

RE: The announcement by the Obama Administration that it will give "aid" to the Syrian rebels currently fighting the regime of Dictator-for-Life Bashir Al-Assad.

I seem to recall an old saying that goes something like this:

When your enemy is making a mistake, don't interrupt him.

Khaddaffi Dead, NATO Protects Next Dictator-in-Waiting...

While the news of the gruesome and all-too-late death of Colonel Moammar Khadaffi is welcome, it should not be greeted with all the expressions of hope that many in the Obama Administration, particularly President Frequent-Flyer-Miles, himself, have attached to the event.

Despite the evocation of a belief that, with this brutal jerkoff now pushing up the daisies, Libya is on the path to democracy, exasperating experience (and history) has often shown that no such thing will happen, nor should it be expected to happen, without continued sacrifices in blood, treasure and political capital by the West. Particularly, by the United States.

Gotcha, Cocksucker!

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Told You So...

This was all too easy to predict...

Good thing the U.N. authorized that No-Fly Zone, huh?

Personally, I'd let them slaughter each other, and then for good measure, bomb whoever was left alive.

Also:

Khadaffi taunts the West because he can.

Let's see if the Great Hopenchanger can pull a speech out of his teleprompter for this thorny issue. After he's done playing golf in Brazil, of course. Gotta keep the priorities in order.